<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glad that Tufte agrees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.natashascorner.com/2009/02/13/glad-that-tufte-agrees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.natashascorner.com/2009/02/13/glad-that-tufte-agrees/</link>
	<description>thoughts on design, user experience, and other things that begin with letters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Natasha Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.natashascorner.com/2009/02/13/glad-that-tufte-agrees/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 21:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natashascorner.com/?p=282#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Yep, that would be him. :)

(at least that&#039;s what I&#039;m assuming...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that would be him. <img src='http://www.natashascorner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(at least that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m assuming&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robby</title>
		<link>http://www.natashascorner.com/2009/02/13/glad-that-tufte-agrees/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Robby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 21:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natashascorner.com/?p=282#comment-512</guid>
		<description>I have such mixed feelings on this. Oh, and is Chief Curmudgeon Stefaan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have such mixed feelings on this. Oh, and is Chief Curmudgeon Stefaan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.natashascorner.com/2009/02/13/glad-that-tufte-agrees/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natashascorner.com/?p=282#comment-482</guid>
		<description>@&quot;Chief Curmudgeon&quot;: 
I admit, when I write sentences like my example above, I do pluralize the subject so I can write &quot;they&quot; rather than he/she. What Tufte was talking about, however, is presentations and I think in that case, it&#039;s ok to use imperfect grammar. 

In writing, poor grammar stands out like a sore thumb to people such as yourself and anyone else that has ever studied even the most basic rules of grammar. But when you&#039;re speaking, relaxing your grammar is sometimes preferable. As Tufte points out, saying &quot;they&quot; makes sure you don&#039;t alienate anyone in the audience. It also makes you sound more relaxed and natural, which makes the presentation easier to take in.

In practice, I typically relax my grammar when speaking and when writing in a casual style, like on this blog. When I write specifications or other formal documents, I do take care to use correct grammar. The difference is in whether you want your words to sound like a conversation or like a speech. I tend to lean toward the casual/conversational tone, but that&#039;s is not for everybody. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@&#8221;Chief Curmudgeon&#8221;:<br />
I admit, when I write sentences like my example above, I do pluralize the subject so I can write &#8220;they&#8221; rather than he/she. What Tufte was talking about, however, is presentations and I think in that case, it&#8217;s ok to use imperfect grammar. </p>
<p>In writing, poor grammar stands out like a sore thumb to people such as yourself and anyone else that has ever studied even the most basic rules of grammar. But when you&#8217;re speaking, relaxing your grammar is sometimes preferable. As Tufte points out, saying &#8220;they&#8221; makes sure you don&#8217;t alienate anyone in the audience. It also makes you sound more relaxed and natural, which makes the presentation easier to take in.</p>
<p>In practice, I typically relax my grammar when speaking and when writing in a casual style, like on this blog. When I write specifications or other formal documents, I do take care to use correct grammar. The difference is in whether you want your words to sound like a conversation or like a speech. I tend to lean toward the casual/conversational tone, but that&#8217;s is not for everybody. <img src='http://www.natashascorner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.natashascorner.com/2009/02/13/glad-that-tufte-agrees/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natashascorner.com/?p=282#comment-475</guid>
		<description>I must diasagree. It is never correct, grammatically or otherwise, to refer to a singular with a plural. If you are loth to use the circumlocutive constructions &quot;him or her&quot; or &quot;s/he&quot;, simply make the subject plural as well. That is, instead of writing an abomination such as &quot;*The user can change their settings by ...&quot;, write instead &quot;Users can change their settings by ...&quot;. No information is lost, communication is not impeded, and noone is alienated, grammarians included.

I know I&#039;m fighting a losing battle on this front, but battle I must, and will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must diasagree. It is never correct, grammatically or otherwise, to refer to a singular with a plural. If you are loth to use the circumlocutive constructions &#8220;him or her&#8221; or &#8220;s/he&#8221;, simply make the subject plural as well. That is, instead of writing an abomination such as &#8220;*The user can change their settings by &#8230;&#8221;, write instead &#8220;Users can change their settings by &#8230;&#8221;. No information is lost, communication is not impeded, and noone is alienated, grammarians included.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m fighting a losing battle on this front, but battle I must, and will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
